Grieve v Gomez  QDC 298 (16/233) Muir DCJ 8 December 2017
A Gold Coast medical specialist who made a proposition to a patient that she should become his mistress has
been ordered to pay compensation for the resulting psychiatric injury and humiliation. Former N.Z. fashion model
Faye Grieve laughed off the doctor’s advances even after he made it clear the arrangement would come with a
condo, a car and regular nights out.
She observed that the specialist’s wife would probably think ill of such a tryst and made it clear she was happily
married. About 12 months later in April 2007, the dermatologist, Dr Rene Gomez, asked her to strip down to a
gown for a full body examination so he could inspect other parts of her body.
Five months later Grieve reported to another skin doctor that Gomez had, in that examination, stroked the inside
of her thighs, “like a husband would do in foreplay” and briefly massaged her breasts and buttocks. That skin
doctor advised her to contact the medical board and police to report Dr Gomez.
Apprehensive of the distress a complaint against Dr Gomez would bring to her, she made no contact with the medical
board until five years later. Gomez did not file any opposition to Grieve’s civil damages claim when it was eventually
filed in 2016.
Neither did he plead any limitation defence nor did he oppose her application in August 2017 for a “freezing order”
to prevent the disposal of his Gold Coast home so that it would remain available to meet the proceeds of the final damages
When the case came before Judge Catherine Muir in Southport’s District Court for assessment of damages, Gomez appeared
without legal representation only to contend that the $150k damages sought by his former patient, was out of proportion
to the events that had occurred. Judge Muir was concerned at the lack of precise detail in the plaintiff’s affidavit, of the physical
examination episode when the assaults were alleged to have occurred. She nevertheless accepted the truth of the events and
that Grieve felt immediate disgust and humiliation, and taken to the shower scrubbing herself, to be found there by her
husband, shivering, several hours later.
Her honour took the view however, that the 70-yr-old’s damages ask was “unreasonably high”. Of the $43k eventually awarded,
a meagre $11k was, due to the application of the Civil Liability Act scale, attributable to psychiatric injury. The $50k claim for
aggravating, insulting and humiliating conduct was, given Gomez had not challenged or delayed the proceedings, pared back to
just $15k. The exemplary damages sort, it was submitted where appropriate given that no criminal prosecution had occurred, this
was rejected because the court considered no additional “punishment” was required.
Following a period of suspension, Dr Gomez was permanently banned from consulting female patients. Judge Muir noted in her
judgement that because of his age it was unlikely he was any longer practising medicine.